Comparison between the Sony A6100 and the Sony A6400

a6400

Consequently, all you’ll have to do is choose the one that best matches your budget and photography style. I don’t want to fiddle with camera settings, and I’m seeking for the greatest camera that will take the best shot without me having to spend hours figuring out how to set it up correctly. I am not concerned with the quality of video, but rather with the quality of photographs. I am new to photography and am debating between the Fujifilm x-T30, the Nikon Z50, and the Sony A6400 as my first camera.

a6400

The first thing I’d like to point out is that all three models are equipped with the same hybrid autofocus technology, which has 425 phase detection points and 425 contrast detection points scattered over 84 percent of the sensor’s surface area. With a focus acquisition time of 0.02s and a powerful software algorithm that incorporates artificial intelligence and machine learning technology, they are among the fastest cameras available. The overall judgments of some of the most prominent camera review websites are summarized in the table to the right of this paragraph (amateurphotographer , cameralabs , digitalcameraworld , dpreview , ephotozine , photographyblog ). The sensor absorbs more light when it has a greater light sensitivity rating.

a6400

If you are shooting in NTSC mode with either the a6400 or the a6600, you may pick between 60fps and 120fps, and if you are filming in PAL mode, you can choose between 50fps and 100fps. In order to capture video at a greater frame rate, you must use the a6100, which only supports 60 frames per second or 50 frames per second. Both cameras will offer significant benefits over the Canon M50, which does not utilise the whole sensor while recording 4K video and has a number of other drawbacks, such as the inability to focus when shooting 120 frames per second in slow motion. All of the a6000 series sensors perform similarly in low-light situations, thus there isn’t much of a difference between them… as long as they are utilized appropriately, all of them are excellent choices.

a6400

All three cameras have the ability to be charged through USB, although none of them come with an additional battery charger. Sony has opted to remove the Picture Profiles from the a6100, which means that only the a6400 and a6600 will include HLG, S-Log2 and S-Log3 Picture Profiles. All three cameras are also compatible with Sony’s Real-time Tracking and Eye AF systems, which may be used for both people and animals.

a6400

It may be highly perplexing if you are new to Sony or haven’t been following their APS-C line-up very carefully since the naming conventions as well as the variances between the models can be very confounding. When it comes to cameras, I believe I will select somewhere between the Nikon Z50 and the Fujifilm X-T30. Those are three very fantastic cameras, and you’ll surely be quite pleased with any of them, regardless of whatever you choose. All three cameras have excellent picture and video capabilities, and they should all be excellent for vacation and basic family photography in general.

a6400

Sony’s new flagship A6600 replaces the A6500 in terms of functionality, but it takes a somewhat different approach overall. It is not just this that contributes to the minor increase in body fat, but also the addition of a new FZ100 battery that provides double the battery life of the previous models. The A6600, on the other hand, does not have the same massive buffer capacity as the A6500.

a6400

If you wish to make a change, you just turn the dial rather than navigating through the menu system on the back LCD and seeking for an option to alter. The lenses are of excellent quality, but they will be more costly than many of the Sony choices (although Sigma, Tamron, Samyang, and other third-party lenses are available for Sony cameras as alternatives). Sony is not renowned for being user-friendly, but when it comes to shooting video, you should be able to sit down with the manual, make sure that everything is set to the settings you want, and then forget about the camera. Sony has superb eye-focus that follows your movements rather than arbitrarily focusing on the backdrop… this is one feature that distinguishes it from other fantastic alternatives. I believe that the a6400 is a considerably better camera for not a huge amount more money, hence I would recommend it.

a6400

The Sony A6400 succeeded the Sony A6300, which had been replaced by the Sony A6000. The Sony A6100 replaced the Sony A6000. More detailed information on the two cameras (including user guides and manuals), as well as associated accessories, may be found on the Sony official website. Specifically, the Sony A6100 and the Sony A6400 have precisely the same width and height, resulting in bodies that are equal in size in this specific instance. In this respect, it is worth noting that the A6400 is splash and dust resistant, whilst the A6100 does not have any weather-sealing of its own. Due to the fact that it includes two memory card slots, you can save more photographs without having to swap memory cards.

a6400

The camera buffer is equivalent in size to the RAM that can be found on my own computer. Our ability to capture digital pictures at extraordinarily rapid rates is made possible by the buffer. Neither of these cameras has the ability to shoot at a higher frame rate than 11.

a6400

In addition to this, one very significant distinction is that the a6100 lacks the magnesium alloy body and weather sealing that can be found in both the a6400 and the a6600. Because of the bigger NP-FZ100 battery, the a6600 has had to be redesigned to fit it. It also contains an additional custom button on the top and the back of the device, as well as two other custom buttons on the mode dial, among other features. 8 frames per second gives you live vision and extremely brief blackouts, which makes it simpler to watch things in motion, such as birds in flight, when you choose this option.

a6400

The most notable improvements are the 180-degree flip-screen, 4K video capabilities, and Sony’s up-to-date autofocus mechanism, which has a stated reaction time of 0.02 seconds. The updated BIONZ processor allows for a greater maximum ISO setting, but other than that, both cameras are very identical to one another. This camera retains the somewhat low-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF) seen in the A6000, along with the same cramped-feeling 3-inch 922k dot ‘wide’ back screen used in all of the A6000-series models.

a6400

But if you’re shooting in low light, you’ll discover that the a6100’s increased ISO range is limited to ISO, but the a6400 and a6600 can capture images up to 102,400 ISO (the highest possible). Take a look at my almost comprehensive list of lenses for the Sony E mount if you’re interested in learning more. However, a decent lens that lets in a lot of light is what makes any of them MUCH better in low light than the others. A lens’s light transmission capacity may be determined by glancing at the “f” number in the lens’s designation…. The lesser the number, the greater the amount of light.

a6400

Залишити відповідь

Ваша e-mail адреса не оприлюднюватиметься. Обов’язкові поля позначені *